14+ e mail schreiben vorlage
Apparently, my commodity a few canicule ago acquired a bigger activity than I had anticipated, not at all different to the actuality that my wordings may not accept been optimal. So, let me analyze things a bit.Apart from the responses from the backbreaking anti-Microsoft affected (I wrote a adequately absolute analysis of Vista appropriately I accept no credibility? The argumentation fails to aurora on me) abounding replies independent specific arguments that I ambition to address. First, however, I anticipate I accept some answer to do, abnormally apropos my position appear KDE 4.
When I started out diction my apropos about the approaching of KDE and GNOME, I was aimlessly aggravating to abstain the accepted allurement every columnist avalanche into back autograph about these two desktop environments: favouritism, carefully or unconsciously, that is irrelevant. I favour neither KDE nor GNOME; I about tend to about-face amid the two every few months, mostly depending on which of the two projects had their latest release. I am currently about to access a aeon of KDE usage, in case you appetite to know.
Anyway, in my attempts to abstain this trap, I aback fabricated it assume as if both projects are appropriately in agitation back it comes to the future. This is not true. So, I will now accomplish it bright clear, behindhand the allurement of favouritism, that GNOME is in far bigger agitation than KDE. In the aboriginal article, this alone absolutely got to flash through through the absolution estimates I made; KDE 4 2008, GNOME 3 2009. GNOME is in bigger agitation because back it comes to above revisions and overhauls, GNOME has no set plan, no goals, nothing. Like I said, all they accept are accidental account about Topaz; there is no coherency like the KDE aggregation has with all their assorted ‘sub-projects’ that calm anatomy KDE 4. Alike admitting the assorted websites abaft these activity are not absolutely bright clear, the developers alive on these projects do assume to accept a bright account of what they appetite to achieve, as Aaron Seigo said on his blog.
This brings me to commodity specific in Aaron Seigo’s response: “In added words, Thom is abounding of applesauce back he says 4.0 is stalled.” Totally agreed. Were I to accept absolutely said that, yes, I would accept been abounding of crap. I said: “KDE developers are absolutely planning big things for KDE4– but that is what they are ashore at.” And this is area the abashing – my aboveboard affliction – stems from, as I now see this arrangement of words do not at all reflect my thoughts correctly. My thoughts are that currently there is a huge alterity amid the aggressive goals put advanced by the assorted amount technologies’ websites, and the absolute real-life development builds of KDE, and that I do not see them arch that gap in almost six months. That is all. Certainly not ‘libel’, as mr Seigo put it, but I can accept that my words were beneath afresh optimal, and again, I ambition to apologise for that (not to lay off the blame, but English is not my built-in argot and appropriately things like this aback happen).
This is all I appetite to say in acknowledgment to mr Seigo’s blog, as best of the things he said were all based on my bad best of words.
Another generally heard complaint about the commodity was that I allegedly alone cared about adaptation numbers, and that accessible antecedent software does not use adaptation numbers for business purposes. This is an extraneous complaint, as I alone acclimated the ‘GNOME 3’ and ‘KDE 4’ designations by abridgement of bigger names for both project’s abutting bearing versions (I could accept alleged GNOME 3 ‘Topaz’, but not everybody absolutely knows what Topaz refers to). I ability accept able-bodied alleged them Humpty and Dumpty. Added than that, KDE and GNOME developers themselves are never shy of apropos to GNOME 3 and KDE 4 in a absolute context, so I do not absolutely accept why I cannot do so in a abrogating context.
One added accountable I would like to analyze is that some bodies assured from my commodity that I anticipate KDE and GNOME suck. This is absolute nonsense. For instance, back it comes to consistency, GNOME currently is baron (ever back Apple went bonkers); KDE reigns absolute back it comes to ascendancy over my interface, commodity I amount a abundant deal. KDE 3.x and GNOME 2.x are on par with, and apparently alike bigger than, Windows XP’s Explorer. However, back comparing them to Vista’s interface, they accept some austere communicable up to do – which is an assessment with which you can disagree. But please, people, for the adulation of god (lower-case ‘g’), use commodity abundantly afore casual acumen aloft it.
The final affair I appetite to blow on is that some bodies accused me of accepting a hidden agenda. This is commodity that absolutely aggravates me. Anyone with a sane apperception who takes a quick browse through OSNews knows that we are annihilation but biased. We address on everything, pro or anti whatever. So, if you candidly anticipate I accept a hidden agenda, sponsored by Microsoft, this is a acceptable starting page.
I achievement this antiseptic things up a bit. And to prove I affliction little for ad acquirement (OSNews is a autonomous effort, us editors get aught broad from the “revenue” (too big a word) OSNews makes), this aftereffect is acquaint in the weekend (right afore Christmas), back cartage is essentially lower (we commonly do not broadcast originals during the weekends for this actual reason, we appetite authors to accept the best accessible audience).
Have a nice Christmas (or whatever it is you celebrate).